Of rubber
Waterproof rubber boots covering the ankle but not the knee
HSN 6401 92 10 (waterproof rubber boots covering the ankle but not the knee) is covered by a Bureau of Indian Standards Quality Control Order. Conformity to the applicable Indian Standard — IS 17012:2018, IS 5557, IS 13995:1995, IS 16994:2018, IS 17037:2018, IS 17043, or IS 15298 depending on end-use — is mandatory under the ISI Mark Scheme with effect from 01 August 2024. No separate customs-clearance overlay applies beyond the BIS QCO obligation.
- 1Identify the precise end-use category of the footwear and map it to the applicable Indian Standard before sourcing: IS 5557:2004 for industrial and protective rubber knee and ankle boots; IS 5557 (Part 2):2018 for all rubber gum and ankle boots; IS 13995:1995 for unlined moulded rubber boots; IS 16994:2018 for municipal scavenging footwear; IS 17012:2018 for high-ankle tactical boots with PU-rubber sole; IS 17037:2018 for anti-riot shoes; IS 17043 (Part 1) or (Part 2) for service or general-purpose shoes; IS 15298 (Parts 2, 3, or 4) for personal protective equipment footwear.Footwear Made from All-Rubber and All-Polymeric Material and Its Components (Quality Control) Order, 2024 · S.O. 1422(E) dated 15-03-2024; Footwear Made from Leather and Other Materials (Quality Control) Order, 2024 · S.O. 1421(E) dated 15-03-2024; Personal Protective Equipment – Footwear (Quality Control) Amendment Order, 2021 · S.O. 3857(E) dated 27-10-2020
- 2Source only from a Bureau of Indian Standards CM/L-licensed manufacturer holding a current licence against the specific IS applicable to the end-use category. Verify the supplier's CM/L number, licensed product scope, and manufacturing facility on the BIS online register before placing the purchase order.Scheme-I of Schedule-II of the BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018 · S.O. 1422(E) dated 15-03-2024
- 3Ensure every pair of boots bears the ISI mark and the supplier's CM/L number under licence per Scheme-I of Schedule-II to the BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018. Marking must appear on the product itself, not on the packaging alone.Scheme-I of Schedule-II of the BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018 · S.O. 1422(E) dated 15-03-2024; S.O. 1421(E) dated 15-03-2024
- 4Quote the supplier's BIS CM/L number, the applicable IS reference, and the controlling QCO notification on the bill of entry. Customs verifies the CM/L in real time against the BIS register; an absent, expired, or scope-mismatched licence triggers consignment detention.BIS Act, 2016 · Customs Act, 1962 · S.O. 1422(E) dated 15-03-2024; S.O. 3775(E) dated 11-08-2022
- 5Confirm whether the importing entity qualifies as a micro or small manufacturing unit under Section 7 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. If so, document the MSME classification; the QCO exemption under S.O. 3775(E) applies only to manufacturing units, not to trading importers.S.O. 3775(E) dated 11-08-2022 · Section 7 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006
The single most common error on this tariff line is treating the QCO as a single-IS obligation and obtaining a CM/L against IS 17012:2018 alone, without recognising that the QCO schedule maps eleven distinct Indian Standards to this HSN by end-use category. A consignment of municipal scavenging boots certified under IS 17012:2018 (tactical boots) will fail port verification because the CM/L scope does not match the product type; detention follows even though a valid licence exists. End-use-specific IS mapping must be completed before the purchase order, not reconciled at the bill-of-entry stage.